Back to: Origins of the Internet
|
Perfection Vs. Effectiveness |
|
| Baran's
idea is based on the concept of poor reliability of the system.
This could seem senseless and too risky, but it is a statistically
acceptable method to create an optimal communication system.
In fact a system too rigid and centralized, though highly reliable and strong-knotted, would represent a much higher risk of total disruption of the network, whereas the occasional flaw in the delivery of single messages, gives an overall better performance of the system, especially if the network is likely to be severely battered in some of its parts. In other words, Paul Baran's priority was the stability of the network as a whole, and the paramount concepts were decentralization and redundancy.
|
|
|
Packet switching & the TCP/IP protocol |
|
| The
two main communication systems are the circuit switching and the packet
switching. The first is used in the telephone network, where the
connection between two telephones is made by the selection of a main
operating switch, and once established the connection is kept on until
the phone call is finished.
In the packet switching system, messages are not sent as a whole but they are divided into smaller pieces, called packets, that can be individuallyforwarded to the receiver. At the receiver's end these packets are put back together and the whole message reconstructed. However, you need specific procedures (protocols) to make the network function, instructions computers have to follow in order to exchange data. So, a number of protocols were devised
in the 1970s to let computers communicate. The one that eventually
became a standard was the TCP (Transmission Control Protocol),
which converts messages into streams of packets at the source, then
reassembles them back into messages once they reach their destination. This is how Vinton Cerf (1) (who invented the general architecture of the Internet together with Bob Kahn) describes how the Internet works: |
|
|
|
Back to: Origins of the Internet
The Web